Tag Archives: publishers

PaperC went rogue.

Traditional book fairs are great — we’ve enjoyed a lot of success with them — but we wanted to try something a little different this year. After a great time at LBF in April, it didn’t seem the best use of resources to go to similar-veined BEA a mere six weeks later. Instead of New York, I went to beautiful Chicago for the annual meeting of AAUP — Association of American University Presses.

No doubt, it was a risk. The AAUP meeting wasn’t a book fair, and the top priority for presses attending was not formal meetings to discuss new business ventures.

But with risk comes opportunity, and that’s the only way for a start-up to flourish. AAUP offered the chance to meet with publishers who don’t tend to show up in London, New York or even Frankfurt — the mother of all book fairs. These are important American university presses with excellent content that PaperC users need to have — and vice versa, the presses want access to German and European academic markets. That makes PaperC a perfect bridge.

At book fairs, we do a lot of talking. This two-day event was a moment to listen. What do presses need? What do they already do well? What do they need help with, and how can we be that help?
Sitting in on great sessions about eBooks, digital sales and metadata — chaired by household names like Princeton, Stanford, Yale and University of California — I learned a great deal about what’s happening right now inside American university presses.
I did some talking, as well. At a session about “chunking” content (splitting up and selling parts of books), I was given an ad-hoc few minutes to stand before a packed conference room to explain PaperC’s positive experience and strong expertise in page and chapter sales.
The response was overwhelming. Eyes widened, attentions fixed, hands went up. When the session broke up, I had the chance to chat one-on-one with a handful of representatives from various presses, all intensely interested in PaperC’s model of success.
In less than two days, I ran out of a box full of business cards. Towards the end of the conference, there was no more cold introduction, because the PaperC name was already familiar.
This is a vital point. AAUP is a small, important and close-knit group of top-notch university publishers. There is a multiplier effect: talk to one, and you talk to three, which in turn puts you in touch with 5 more. And so on.
I am excited to see what tangible gains come from PaperC’s presence in Chicago. University presses are eager to expand their online offerings, and given PaperC’s easy entry to joining the platform, the range of features and services offered, and the potential revenue to be made, it is a common sense conclusion that PaperC users will, in due time, gain access to invaluable academic content from across the Atlantic.

the battlefield of online piracy ..

… looks like this, actually, according to the reliable source of visual.ly:

… and I am amazed to find out that bloggers measure same side as social networks do scaling the impact of (maybe unwillingly) sharing (maybe illegal) media. Once you consider who’s impact and benefit is the biggest you may easily find out about why we’re not going to have a publisher/content provider etc side based solution to this. Just the way you can not fix a hole in the Apollo13 with a bubblegum.

very brief poll on ebook flat rates / subscription model / .com feature plans

We’re fuzzing on getting as much publishers as possible into the flat rate model, which is to be exact a subscription model and means: You only pay for as much as you read, publishers get paid for the content that’s really useful.

Skip the fuzz and go to poll w/out a good reason

Of course this does not support the model of publishing as everyone was used to so far: Market a book, set a price, get paid and then no longer care about what the reader actually does with the book. (Same with music where single track downloading changed the whole game, look where it lead.) 80% of books are not read beyond the first 50 pages – but paid for as much pages they have! This makes perfect sense in a world, where a whole book has to be published, where the entire book has to be stored, delivered, taken back and put to waste disposal if need is. This world does no longer exist since we’re having digital versions of nearly everything (where the number of pages is even smaller). And therefore publishers have to learn a lot of difficult lessons about what readers (let’s call them readers while they’re users for another 6 month) want and what they’re willing to pay for – if at all.

Our job right now is to a) convince publishers to contribute their content or b) let them watch others do it while they go on publishing and selling whole ebooks into a shrinking market.

To support them at least a little we’re building the perfect platform for an instant access to high quality textbooks and make sure that readers are happy and contended with their products – if they let us do so. Publishers are a motley crew of different personalities yet they have two things in common: they’re usually sweet and they love numbers. We need to give them some:

Go to poll now

Thank you. Publishers will appreciate your help. Me too.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.